Data were analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. Earliest descriptive analyses was basically performed, also Cronbach’s alphas and you will wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between intercourse, ages, intimate positioning, that have a romantic/intimate lover, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you will readiness to take part in sexting since the independent variables, together with four sexting habits given that based details. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos was thought to be a measure of perception proportions. All of the details was basically registered to the model additionally. The analysis has also been stratified by intercourse.
Incidence away from sexting habits
The most widespread sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and obtaining thru a mediator (twenty-eight.4%), with 3rd-people forwarding out-of intimate content (9.3%) and you may, finally, sending (8.1%). Detailed analytics are given into the Table 2.
https://kissbrides.com/american-women/portland-ia/
The latest regression habits was in fact tall. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .42 towards the “sending” design, .31 for the “receiving” design, .23 toward “third-cluster forwarding” design, and you may .17 to your “searching through an intermediary” design (Table step three:
On the “sending” design, desire in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% depend on interval [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/intimate mate (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), sexual orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-3.00) and you can years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step 14-step 1.63) was in fact somewhat associated with giving wedding. Regarding “receiving” model, having an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: step three.27; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), willingness to sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-dos.41), using Snapchat (OR: step one.6step one; 95% CI: 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-1.86) and you may ages (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.step 12-step 1.41) were notably connected with researching wedding.
Regarding the “third-group forwarding” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-6.51), desire in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-dos.72), intercourse (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: step one.3dos-2.91), that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-2.68), having fun with Twitter (OR: step one.53; 95% CI: step one.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step one.09-step 1.87) and ages (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-1.66) was basically significantly linked to involvement within the 3rd-group forwarding.
Regarding the “searching via a mediator” design, using Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step one.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-dos.24), that have an intimate/sexual partner (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: step 1.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.41; 95% CI: step 1.1step one-1.80) and ages (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-step one.49) have been notably connected with wedding for the searching via an intermediary.
Intercourse distinctions
The new regression models were significant. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .50 for girls and you will .41 getting males towards the “sending” model; .31 for women and you may .31 having men with the “receiving” model; .18 for females and you may .twenty-four to possess boys into the “third-class forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for women and you may .22 for men on the “choosing via a mediator” model (Desk 4:
On the “sending” design, for girls, readiness to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), having an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you will many years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: 1.17-2.20) was basically somewhat connected with sending wedding. To possess people, these were determination in order to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step three.68-9.94), which have an intimate/intimate partner (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: step one.59-4.88) and making use of Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).
Regarding the “receiving” design, for women, willingness to help you sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), which have an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and you will years (OR: step 1.42; 95% CI: step 1.step one7-1.72) was indeed notably associated with searching wedding. To have men, they were which have an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), determination so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step 3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step one.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step 1.86) and you may many years (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step 1.38).